↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Neurophysiology Education in Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical journal of pain, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
435 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
819 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Neurophysiology Education in Chronic Low Back Pain
Published in
Clinical journal of pain, January 2004
DOI 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Lorimer Moseley, Michael K. Nicholas, Paul W. Hodges

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral pain management programs typically achieve improvements in pain cognitions, disability, and physical performance. However, it is not known whether the neurophysiology education component of such programs contributes to these outcomes. In chronic low back pain patients, we investigated the effect of neurophysiology education on cognitions, disability, and physical performance. This study was a blinded randomized controlled trial. Individual education sessions on neurophysiology of pain (experimental group) and back anatomy and physiology (control group) were conducted by trained physical therapist educators. Cognitions were evaluated using the Survey of Pain Attitudes (revised) (SOPA(R)), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Behavioral measures included the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and 3 physical performance tasks; (1) straight leg raise (SLR), (2) forward bending range, and (3) an abdominal "drawing-in" task, which provides a measure of voluntary activation of the deep abdominal muscles. Methodological checks evaluated non-specific effects of intervention. There was a significant treatment effect on the SOPA(R), PCS, SLR, and forward bending. There was a statistically significant effect on RMDQ; however, the size of this effect was small and probably not clinically meaningful. Education about pain neurophysiology changes pain cognitions and physical performance but is insufficient by itself to obtain a change in perceived disability. The results suggest that pain neurophysiology education, but not back school type education, should be included in a wider pain management approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 819 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 785 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 15%
Student > Bachelor 99 12%
Other 91 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 86 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 9%
Other 212 26%
Unknown 135 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 315 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 174 21%
Psychology 39 5%
Sports and Recreations 33 4%
Neuroscience 21 3%
Other 64 8%
Unknown 173 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,146,901
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#100
of 2,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,885
of 147,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.