| Title |
Optimization of machining parameters using genetic algorithm and experimental validation for end-milling operations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00170-005-0384-3 |
| Authors |
P. Palanisamy, I. Rajendran, S. Shanmugasundaram |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 85 | 59% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,965,094
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
#80
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,420
of 67,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.