↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory Syncytial Virus—A Comprehensive Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 724)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
433 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
739 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory Syncytial Virus—A Comprehensive Review
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12016-013-8368-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea T. Borchers, Christopher Chang, M. Eric Gershwin, Laurel J. Gershwin

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is amongst the most important pathogenic infections of childhood and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although there have been extensive studies of epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic techniques, animal models and the immunobiology of infection, there is not yet a convincing and safe vaccine available. The major histopathologic characteristics of RSV infection are acute bronchiolitis, mucosal and submucosal edema, and luminal occlusion by cellular debris of sloughed epithelial cells mixed with macrophages, strands of fibrin, and some mucin. There is a single RSV serotype with two major antigenic subgroups, A and B. Strains of both subtypes often co-circulate, but usually one subtype predominates. In temperate climates, RSV infections reflect a distinct seasonality with onset in late fall or early winter. It is believed that most children will experience at least one RSV infection by the age of 2 years. There are several key animal models of RSV. These include a model in mice and, more importantly, a bovine model; the latter reflects distinct similarity to the human disease. Importantly, the prevalence of asthma is significantly higher amongst children who are hospitalized with RSV in infancy or early childhood. However, there have been only limited investigations of candidate genes that have the potential to explain this increase in susceptibility. An atopic predisposition appears to predispose to subsequent development of asthma and it is likely that subsequent development of asthma is secondary to the pathogenic inflammatory response involving cytokines, chemokines and their cognate receptors. Numerous approaches to the development of RSV vaccines are being evaluated, as are the use of newer antiviral agents to mitigate disease. There is also significant attention being placed on the potential impact of co-infection and defining the natural history of RSV. Clearly, more research is required to define the relationships between RSV bronchiolitis, other viral induced inflammatory responses, and asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 739 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 732 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 16%
Student > Master 92 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 12%
Researcher 80 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 4%
Other 107 14%
Unknown 218 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 84 11%
Unspecified 20 3%
Other 79 11%
Unknown 231 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,076,931
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#31
of 724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,814
of 212,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.