Title |
Future perspectives in melanoma research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12967-016-1070-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paolo A. Ascierto, Sanjiv Agarwala, Gerardo Botti, Alessandra Cesano, Gennaro Ciliberto, Michael A. Davies, Sandra Demaria, Reinhard Dummer, Alexander M. Eggermont, Soldano Ferrone, Yang Xin Fu, Thomas F. Gajewski, Claus Garbe, Veronica Huber, Samir Khleif, Michael Krauthammer, Roger S. Lo, Giuseppe Masucci, Giuseppe Palmieri, Michael Postow, Igor Puzanov, Ann Silk, Stefani Spranger, David F. Stroncek, Ahmad Tarhini, Janis M. Taube, Alessandro Testori, Ena Wang, Jennifer A. Wargo, Cassian Yee, Hassane Zarour, Laurence Zitvogel, Bernard A. Fox, Nicola Mozzillo, Francesco M. Marincola, Magdalena Thurin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 39 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 32% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 14% |
Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,279
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,797
of 316,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#51
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.