↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative molecular analysis of total tumor load in sentinel lymph node: a new predictor of axillary status in early breast cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Intraoperative molecular analysis of total tumor load in sentinel lymph node: a new predictor of axillary status in early breast cancer patients
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10549-013-2524-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicente Peg, Martín Espinosa-Bravo, Begoña Vieites, Felip Vilardell, José R. Antúnez, Magdalena Sancho de Salas, Julio J. Delgado-Sánchez, Willy Pinto, Francisco Gozalbo, Anna Petit, Irene Sansano, María del Mar Téllez, Isabel T. Rubio

Abstract

To assess the intraoperative positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) total tumor load (TTL, defined as the amount of CK19 mRNA copies [copies/μL] in all positive SLNs) obtained by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) and to determine whether it is predictive of non-SLNs involvement. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND/DATA: The OSNA assay (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) is a new diagnostic technique that uses molecular biological techniques to analyze SLN that has been validated as an accurate method for detection of positive SLN. Although the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial has defined a select cohort of patients in whom a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) may be safely omitted, there are a still a number of patients where prediction of non-SLN metastasis may be helpful for cALND decision making. Multiple studies suggest that specific pathologic characteristics of the primary tumor and the SLN metastases are associated with an increased likelihood of additional positive non-SLN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,684,990
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,544
of 4,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,583
of 199,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#47
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.