| Title |
Effects of creatine supplementation on renal function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-007-0669-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Gualano, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Rafael Batista Novaes, Guilherme Gianini Artioli, Maria Heloisa Shimizu, Antonio Carlos Seguro, Roger Charles Harris, Antonio Herbert Lancha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 49% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#596,880
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#164
of 4,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,412
of 168,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.