↓ Skip to main content

Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy
Published in
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/s11017-004-2047-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludvig Beckman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 4 31%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Philosophy 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2009.
All research outputs
#6,492,572
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#92
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,419
of 69,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them