| Title |
Landmark learning: An illustration of associative search
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, November 1981
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00335152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew G. Barto, Richard S. Sutton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 28% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 20 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Psychology | 12 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,449,575
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#28
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234
of 7,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them