You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medication and finance management among HIV-infected adults: The impact of age and cognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1080/13803395.2010.499357 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
April D. Thames, Michelle S. Kim, Brian W. Becker, Jessica M. Foley, Lindsay J. Hines, Elyse J. Singer, Robert K. Heaton, Steven A. Castellon, Charles H. Hinkin |
| Abstract |
This study examined the effects of aging and cognitive impairment on medication and finance management in an HIV sample. We observed main effects of age (older < younger) and neuropsychological impairment on functional task performance. Interactions between age and cognition demonstrated that older impaired individuals performed significantly more poorly than all other comparison groups. There were no relationships between laboratory performance and self-reported medication and finance management. The interaction of advancing age and cognitive impairment may confer significant functional limitations for HIV individuals that may be better detected by performance-based measures of functional abilities rather than patient self-report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,335,133
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
#685
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,688
of 94,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
#92
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.