↓ Skip to main content

Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
946 Mendeley
citeulike
19 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates
Published in
Environmental Microbiology, August 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Kunin, Anna Engelbrektson, Howard Ochman, Philip Hugenholtz

Abstract

Massively parallel pyrosequencing of the small subunit (16S) ribosomal RNA gene has revealed that the extent of rare microbial populations in several environments, the 'rare biosphere', is orders of magnitude higher than previously thought. One important caveat with this method is that sequencing error could artificially inflate diversity estimates. Although the per-base error of 16S rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing has been shown to be as good as or lower than Sanger sequencing, no direct assessments of pyrosequencing errors on diversity estimates have been reported. Using only Escherichia coli MG1655 as a reference template, we find that 16S rDNA diversity is grossly overestimated unless relatively stringent read quality filtering and low clustering thresholds are applied. In particular, the common practice of removing reads with unresolved bases and anomalous read lengths is insufficient to ensure accurate estimates of microbial diversity. Furthermore, common and reproducible homopolymer length errors can result in relatively abundant spurious phylotypes further confounding data interpretation. We suggest that stringent quality-based trimming of 16S pyrotags and clustering thresholds no greater than 97% identity should be used to avoid overestimates of the rare biosphere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 946 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 3%
Canada 8 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Estonia 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Other 31 3%
Unknown 845 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 251 27%
Researcher 224 24%
Student > Master 137 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 5%
Other 134 14%
Unknown 102 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 507 54%
Environmental Science 98 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 85 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 2%
Other 70 7%
Unknown 139 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,246,412
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiology
#147
of 4,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,369
of 105,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiology
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.