↓ Skip to main content

RNA–Amino Acid Binding: A Stereochemical Era for the Genetic Code

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,530)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
RNA–Amino Acid Binding: A Stereochemical Era for the Genetic Code
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00239-009-9270-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Yarus, Jeremy Joseph Widmann, Rob Knight

Abstract

By combining crystallographic and NMR structural data for RNA-bound amino acids within riboswitches, aptamers, and RNPs, chemical principles governing specific RNA interaction with amino acids can be deduced. Such principles, which we summarize in a "polar profile", are useful in explaining newly selected specific RNA binding sites for free amino acids bearing varied side chains charged, neutral polar, aliphatic, and aromatic. Such amino acid sites can be queried for parallels to the genetic code. Using recent sequences for 337 independent binding sites directed to 8 amino acids and containing 18,551 nucleotides in all, we show a highly robust connection between amino acids and cognate coding triplets within their RNA binding sites. The apparent probability (P) that cognate triplets around these sites are unrelated to binding sites is congruent with 5.3 x 10(-45) for codons overall, and P congruent with 2.1 x 10(-46) for cognate anticodons. Therefore, some triplets are unequivocally localized near their present amino acids. Accordingly, there was likely a stereochemical era during evolution of the genetic code, relying on chemical interactions between amino acids and the tertiary structures of RNA binding sites. Use of cognate coding triplets in RNA binding sites is nevertheless sparse, with only 21% of possible triplets appearing. Reasoning from such broad recurrent trends in our results, a majority (approximately 75%) of modern amino acids entered the code in this stereochemical era; nevertheless, a minority (approximately 21%) of modern codons and anticodons were assigned via RNA binding sites. A Direct RNA Template scheme embodying a credible early history for coded peptide synthesis is readily constructed based on these observations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 22%
Chemistry 18 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 20 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,695,039
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#47
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,978
of 111,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them