↓ Skip to main content

Human Microbiome and HIV/AIDS

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Human Microbiome and HIV/AIDS
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11904-011-0103-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepak Saxena, Yihong Li, Liying Yang, Zhiheng Pei, Michael Poles, William R. Abrams, Daniel Malamud

Abstract

Understanding of the human microbiome continues to grow rapidly; however, reports on changes in the microbiome after HIV infection are still limited. This review surveys the progress made in methodology associated with microbiome studies and highlights the remaining challenges to this field. Studies have shown that commensal oral, gut, vaginal, and penile bacteria are vital to the health of the human immune system. Our studies on crosstalk among oral and gastrointestinal soluble innate factors, HIV, and microbes indicated that the oral and gut microbiome was altered in the HIV-positive samples compared to the negative controls. The importance of understanding the bacterial component of HIV/AIDS, and likelihood of "crosstalk" between viral and bacterial pathogens, will help in understanding the role of the microbiome in HIV-infected individuals and facilitate identification of novel antiretroviral factors for use as novel diagnostics, microbicides, or therapeutics against HIV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
South Africa 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 223 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 56 23%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 48 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,347,809
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#88
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,192
of 252,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.