↓ Skip to main content

Menthol: A Fresh Ergogenic Aid for Athletic Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
66 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Menthol: A Fresh Ergogenic Aid for Athletic Performance
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0652-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Stevens, Russ Best

Abstract

The application of menthol has recently been researched as a performance-enhancing aid for various aspects of athletic performance including endurance, speed, strength and joint range of motion. A range of application methods has been used including a mouth rinse, ingestion of a beverage containing menthol or external application to the skin or clothing via a gel or spray. The majority of research has focussed on the use of menthol to impart a cooling sensation on athletes performing endurance exercise in the heat. In this situation, menthol appears to have the greatest beneficial effect on performance when applied internally. In contrast, the majority of investigations into the external application of menthol demonstrated no performance benefit. While studies are limited in number, menthol has not yet proven to be beneficial for speed or strength, and only effective at increasing joint range of motion following exercise that induced delayed-onset muscle soreness. Internal application of menthol may provoke such performance-enhancing effects via mechanisms related to its thermal, ventilatory, analgesic and arousing properties. Future research should focus on well-trained subjects and investigate the addition of menthol to nutritional sports products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 53 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#526,090
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#502
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,766
of 419,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.