| Title |
The yield stress myth?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rheologica Acta, July 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01333960 |
| Authors |
H. A. Barnes, K. Walters |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 34% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 109 | 40% |
| Chemical Engineering | 23 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 17 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 16 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,674,205
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Rheologica Acta
#61
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,518
of 9,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheologica Acta
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them