You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Like it or not? The mental time travel debate: Reply to Clayton et al.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.010 |
| Authors |
Thomas Suddendorf, Janie Busby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 27% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2006.
All research outputs
#5,210,661
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1,544
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,673
of 56,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.