| Title |
‘Cosmetic Neurology’ and the Moral Complicity Argument
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-009-9042-z |
| Authors |
A. Ravelingien, J. Braeckman, L. Crevits, D. De Ridder, E. Mortier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 32% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 27% |
| Philosophy | 8 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2009.
All research outputs
#2,217,708
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#120
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,212
of 92,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them