↓ Skip to main content

自己免疫性脳炎/脳症

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Therapeutics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 108)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
自己免疫性脳炎/脳症
Published in
Neurological Therapeutics, May 2016
DOI 10.15082/jsnt.33.1_19
Authors

高橋 幸利, 木水 友一, 小池 敬義, 堀野 朝子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Therapeutics
#22
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,941
of 311,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Therapeutics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.