↓ Skip to main content

Causal beliefs, cardiac denial and pre-hospital delays following the onset of acute coronary syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Causal beliefs, cardiac denial and pre-hospital delays following the onset of acute coronary syndromes
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10865-008-9174-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Perkins-Porras, Daisy L. Whitehead, Philip C. Strike, Andrew Steptoe

Abstract

Reducing pre-hospital delay is crucial in reducing mortality from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patient's causal beliefs and coping styles may affect symptom appraisal and help-seeking behavior. We examined whether patient's beliefs about the causes of their ACS and denial of impact were associated with pre-hospital delay. Pre-hospital delay data were collected from 177 patients with ACS. Retrospective causal beliefs and cardiac denial of impact were assessed using questionnaires. Factor analysis of causal beliefs produced 3 factors; beliefs in stress and emotional state, behavioral and clinical risk factors, and in heredity as causal influences. Patients with strong beliefs that stress and emotional state caused their ACS were more likely to have long pre-hospital delays (>130 min). There were no significant associations between pre-hospital delay and the other two causal belief factors. Patients with greater denial scores were also more likely to have long delays than those with low scores. These effects were independent of age, gender, education, previous myocardial infarction, history of depression and negative affectivity. Cognitive and emotional factors including patient's beliefs about causes and avoidant coping help to explain variations in pre-hospital delay.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Psychology 17 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2009.
All research outputs
#3,258,599
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#225
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,321
of 89,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them