↓ Skip to main content

The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10539-005-7325-2
Authors

Kirk Fitzhugh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 17 11%
Germany 5 3%
Argentina 5 3%
Mexico 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 125 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 40 25%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 76%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Philosophy 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 11 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2007.
All research outputs
#6,955,174
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#257
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,416
of 88,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them