↓ Skip to main content

DNA methylation biomarkers for noninvasive detection of triple‐negative breast cancer using liquid biopsy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DNA methylation biomarkers for noninvasive detection of triple‐negative breast cancer using liquid biopsy
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, November 2022
DOI 10.1002/ijc.34337
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Non-invasive detection of aberrant DNA methylation could provide invaluable biomarkers for earlier detection of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) which could help clinicians with easier and more efficient treatment options. We evaluated genome-wide DNA methylation data derived from TNBC and normal breast tissues, peripheral blood of TNBC cases and controls, and reference samples of sorted blood and mammary cells. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between TNBC and normal breast tissues were stringently selected, verified, and externally validated. A machine-learning algorithm was applied to select the top DMRs, which then were evaluated on plasma-derived circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples of TNBC patients and healthy controls. We identified 23 DMRs accounting for the methylation profile of blood cells and reference mammary cells and then selected six top DMRs for cfDNA analysis. We quantified un-/methylated copies of these DMRs by droplet digital PCR analysis in a plasma test set from TNBC patients and healthy controls and confirmed our findings obtained on tissues. Differential cfDNA methylation was confirmed in an independent validation set of plasma samples. A methylation score combining signatures of the top three DMRs overlapping with the SPAG6, LINC10606, and TBCD/ZNF750 genes had the best capability to discriminate TNBC patients from controls (AUC=0.78 in the test set and AUC=0.74 in validation set). Our findings demonstrate the usefulness of cfDNA-based methylation signatures as non-invasive liquid biopsy markers for the diagnosis of TNBC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Student > Postgraduate 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 67 82%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 67 82%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,475,378
of 30,457,780 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#3,266
of 13,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,921
of 450,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#30
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,457,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.