| Title |
Insect extinctions on a small denuded Bornean island
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-009-9585-7 |
| Authors |
Navjot S. Sodhi, David S. Wilcove, R. Subaraj, Ding Li Yong, Tien Ming Lee, Henry Bernard, Susan L. H. Lim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2009.
All research outputs
#3,946,302
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#602
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,003
of 175,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.