| Title |
Mobile phone-induced honeybee worker piping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Apidologie, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13592-011-0016-x |
| Authors |
Daniel Favre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Finland | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| San Marino | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 90% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 8% |
| Engineering | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#353,939
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#6
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,147
of 121,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.