↓ Skip to main content

Do indoor plants contribute to the aeromycota in city buildings?

Overview of attention for article published in Aerobiologia, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Do indoor plants contribute to the aeromycota in city buildings?
Published in
Aerobiologia, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10453-012-9282-y
Authors

Fraser R. Torpy, Peter J. Irga, Jason Brennan, Margaret D. Burchett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Estonia 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Engineering 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,190,878
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Aerobiologia
#215
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,898
of 277,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aerobiologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.