↓ Skip to main content

What patient data should be collected in this randomized controlled trial in sepsis?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
What patient data should be collected in this randomized controlled trial in sepsis?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4560-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Djillali Annane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 69%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,393,913
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,018
of 4,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,666
of 319,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#102
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.