You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The debrief imperative: building teaming competencies and team effectiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott I Tannenbaum, Philip E Greilich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 54 | 39% |
| United States | 9 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 27% |
| Scientists | 16 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 25% |
| Psychology | 3 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#409,535
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#146
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,329
of 442,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.