↓ Skip to main content

Trampling impact on vegetation of embryonic and stabilised sand dunes in Montenegro

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Coastal Conservation, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Trampling impact on vegetation of embryonic and stabilised sand dunes in Montenegro
Published in
Journal of Coastal Conservation, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11852-016-0468-2
Authors

Urban Šilc, Danka Caković, Filip Küzmič, Danijela Stešević

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,756,367
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Coastal Conservation
#235
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,166
of 422,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Coastal Conservation
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.