↓ Skip to main content

Identifying complex cultural interactions in the instructional design process: a case study of a cross-border, cross-sector training for innovation program

Overview of attention for article published in Educational technology research and development, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Identifying complex cultural interactions in the instructional design process: a case study of a cross-border, cross-sector training for innovation program
Published in
Educational technology research and development, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11423-013-9291-8
Authors

L. Roxanne Russell, Wanjira L. Kinuthia, Anissa Lokey-Vega, Winnie Tsang-Kosma, Reeny Madathany

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Bulgaria 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Lecturer 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 42%
Arts and Humanities 6 8%
Psychology 6 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,887,459
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#298
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,916
of 205,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.