↓ Skip to main content

One Hundred Questions of Importance to the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
452 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2439 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One Hundred Questions of Importance to the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity
Published in
Conservation Biology, April 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01212.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. J. SUTHERLAND, W. M. ADAMS, R. B. ARONSON, R. AVELING, T. M. BLACKBURN, S. BROAD, G. CEBALLOS, I. M. CÔTÉ, R. M. COWLING, G. A. B. DA FONSECA, E. DINERSTEIN, P. J. FERRARO, E. FLEISHMAN, C. GASCON, M. HUNTER, J. HUTTON, P. KAREIVA, A. KURIA, D. W. MACDONALD, K. MACKINNON, F. J. MADGWICK, M. B. MASCIA, J. MCNEELY, E. J. MILNER‐GULLAND, S. MOON, C. G. MORLEY, S. NELSON, D. OSBORN, M. PAI, E. C. M. PARSONS, L. S. PECK, H. POSSINGHAM, S. V. PRIOR, A. S. PULLIN, M. R. W. RANDS, J. RANGANATHAN, K. H. REDFORD, J. P. RODRIGUEZ, F. SEYMOUR, J. SOBEL, N. S. SODHI, A. STOTT, K. VANCE‐BORLAND, A. R. WATKINSON

Abstract

We identified 100 scientific questions that, if answered, would have the greatest impact on conservation practice and policy. Representatives from 21 international organizations, regional sections and working groups of the Society for Conservation Biology, and 12 academics, from all continents except Antarctica, compiled 2291 questions of relevance to conservation of biological diversity worldwide. The questions were gathered from 761 individuals through workshops, email requests, and discussions. Voting by email to short-list questions, followed by a 2-day workshop, was used to derive the final list of 100 questions. Most of the final questions were derived through a process of modification and combination as the workshop progressed. The questions are divided into 12 sections: ecosystem functions and services, climate change, technological change, protected areas, ecosystem management and restoration, terrestrial ecosystems, marine ecosystems, freshwater ecosystems, species management, organizational systems and processes, societal context and change, and impacts of conservation interventions. We anticipate that these questions will help identify new directions for researchers and assist funders in directing funds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 62 3%
Brazil 41 2%
United Kingdom 29 1%
Canada 14 <1%
India 10 <1%
South Africa 10 <1%
Chile 9 <1%
Australia 9 <1%
Colombia 8 <1%
Other 78 3%
Unknown 2169 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 562 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 446 18%
Student > Master 372 15%
Student > Bachelor 204 8%
Other 132 5%
Other 507 21%
Unknown 216 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1177 48%
Environmental Science 676 28%
Social Sciences 67 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 64 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 1%
Other 134 5%
Unknown 294 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,124,434
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#632
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,802
of 109,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.