| Title |
Hydrogeological framework of the Deccan basalt groundwater systems, west-central India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrogeology Journal, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100400000079 |
| Authors |
H. Kulkarni, S. B. Deolankar, A. Lalwani, B. Joseph, S. Pawar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2008.
All research outputs
#5,543,535
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#153
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,046
of 46,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them