| Title |
Predatory behaviour of an araneophagic assassin bug
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10164-009-0202-8 |
| Authors |
Anne E. Wignall, Phillip W. Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2010.
All research outputs
#5,692,997
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#122
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,675
of 179,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.