↓ Skip to main content

Bibliotherapy as a Treatment for Depression in Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 483)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Bibliotherapy as a Treatment for Depression in Primary Care
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10880-010-9207-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth V. Naylor, David O. Antonuccio, Mark Litt, Gary E. Johnson, Daniel R. Spogen, Richard Williams, Catherine McCarthy, Marcia M. Lu, David C. Fiore, Dianne L. Higgins

Abstract

This study was designed to determine whether a physician-delivered bibliotherapy prescription would compare favorably with the prevailing usual care treatment for depression in primary care (that often involves medication) and potentially offer an alternative. Six family physicians were trained to write and deliver prescriptions for cognitive-behavioral bibliotherapy. Thirty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or a behavioral prescription to read the self-help book, Feeling Good (Burns, D. D. (1999). Feeling good: The new mood therapy. New York: HarperCollins). The treatment groups did not differ in terms of overall outcome variables. Patients in both treatment groups reported statistically significant decreases in depression symptoms, decreases in dysfunctional attitudes, and increases in quality of life. Although not statistically significant, the mean net medical expenses in the behavioral prescription group were substantially less. This study provided empirical evidence that a behavioral prescription for Feeling Good may be as effective as standard care, which commonly involves an antidepressant prescription.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 19%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Philosophy 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,205,569
of 24,931,592 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#9
of 483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,593
of 99,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,931,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.