| Title |
Multiple factors influence adventitious rooting in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) stem cuttings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Growth Regulation, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10725-016-0228-1 |
| Authors |
Joan Villanova, Antonio Cano, Alfonso Albacete, Alfonso López, Emilio Á. Cano, Manuel Acosta, José Manuel Pérez-Pérez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,353,668
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Plant Growth Regulation
#308
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,354
of 313,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Growth Regulation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.