| Title |
Origin and differentiation of nephridia in the Onychophora provide no support for the Articulata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zoomorphology, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00435-005-0006-5 |
| Authors |
Georg Mayer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 6% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 69% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,164,400
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#31
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,255
of 60,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them