↓ Skip to main content

ħ as parameter of Minkowski metric in effective theory

Overview of attention for article published in JETP Letters, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
ħ as parameter of Minkowski metric in effective theory
Published in
JETP Letters, March 2010
DOI 10.1134/s0021364009230027
Authors

G. E. Volovik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 67%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2009.
All research outputs
#5,721,820
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from JETP Letters
#52
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,431
of 96,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JETP Letters
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.