| Title |
Virtuous Circles and the Case for Aid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IMF Economic Review, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41308-016-0012-2 |
| Authors |
Patrick Carter, Jonathan R. W. Temple |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 56% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,739,797
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#113
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,149
of 270,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.