You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.be |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil C Campbell, Elizabeth Murray, Janet Darbyshire, Jon Emery, Andrew Farmer, Frances Griffiths, Bruce Guthrie, Helen Lester, Phil Wilson, Ann Louise Kinmonth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 2% |
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1050 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 227 | 20% |
| Researcher | 189 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 159 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 55 | 5% |
| Other | 273 | 25% |
| Unknown | 150 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 330 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 134 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 131 | 12% |
| Psychology | 108 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 3% |
| Other | 168 | 15% |
| Unknown | 206 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,095,012
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#18,784
of 65,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,916
of 94,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#38
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.