| Title |
Foundations of advanced magnetic resonance imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurotherapeutics, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1602/neurorx.2.2.167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roland Bammer, Stefan Skare, Rexford Newbould, Chunlei Liu, Vincent Thijs, Stefan Ropele, David B. Clayton, Gunnar Krueger, Michael E. Moseley, Gary H. Glover |
| Abstract |
During the past decade, major breakthroughs in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality were made by means of quantum leaps in scanner hardware and pulse sequences. Some advanced MRI techniques have truly revolutionized the detection of disease states and MRI can now-within a few minutes-acquire important quantitative information noninvasively from an individual in any plane or volume at comparatively high resolution. This article provides an overview of the most common advanced MRI methods including diffusion MRI, perfusion MRI, functional MRI, and the strengths and weaknesses of MRI at high magnetic field strengths. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 12 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,101,548
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#444
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,537
of 74,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.