| Title |
Moral Repair in the Workplace: A Qualitative Investigation and Inductive Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-015-2593-5 |
| Authors |
Jerry Goodstein, Ken Butterfield, Nathan Neale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 30% |
| Psychology | 14 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,332,263
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#216
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,539
of 262,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.