↓ Skip to main content

Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for falls in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment: retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
54 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for falls in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment: retrospective cohort study
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-070918
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucinda Archer, Constantinos Koshiaris, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Kym I E Snell, Richard D Riley, Richard Stevens, Amitava Banerjee, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Andrew Clegg, Rupert A Payne, F D Richard Hobbs, Richard J McManus, James P Sheppard, STRAtifying Treatments In the multi-morbid Frail elderlY investigators, John Gladman, Simon Griffin, Margaret Ogden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#509,624
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,896
of 64,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,446
of 440,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#113
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.