You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for falls in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment: retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj-2022-070918 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucinda Archer, Constantinos Koshiaris, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Kym I E Snell, Richard D Riley, Richard Stevens, Amitava Banerjee, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Andrew Clegg, Rupert A Payne, F D Richard Hobbs, Richard J McManus, James P Sheppard, STRAtifying Treatments In the multi-morbid Frail elderlY investigators, John Gladman, Simon Griffin, Margaret Ogden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 19% |
Australia | 4 | 7% |
Spain | 4 | 7% |
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Cabo Verde | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 28 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 65% |
Scientists | 12 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 27% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#509,624
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,896
of 64,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,446
of 440,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#113
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.