Title |
Esperanto for histones: CENP-A, not CenH3, is the centromeric histone H3 variant
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chromosome Research, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10577-013-9347-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
W. C. Earnshaw, R. C. Allshire, B. E. Black, K. Bloom, B. R. Brinkley, W. Brown, I. M. Cheeseman, K. H. A. Choo, G. P. Copenhaver, J. G. DeLuca, A. Desai, S. Diekmann, S. Erhardt, M. Fitzgerald-Hayes, D. Foltz, T. Fukagawa, R. Gassmann, D. W. Gerlich, D. M. Glover, G. J. Gorbsky, S. C. Harrison, P. Heun, T. Hirota, L. E. T. Jansen, G. Karpen, G. J. P. L. Kops, M. A. Lampson, S. M. Lens, A. Losada, K. Luger, H. Maiato, P. S. Maddox, R. L. Margolis, H. Masumoto, A. D. McAinsh, B. G. Mellone, P. Meraldi, A. Musacchio, K. Oegema, R. J. O’Neill, E. D. Salmon, K. C. Scott, A. F. Straight, P. T. Stukenberg, B. A. Sullivan, K. F. Sullivan, C. E. Sunkel, J. R. Swedlow, C. E. Walczak, P. E. Warburton, S. Westermann, H. F. Willard, L. Wordeman, M. Yanagida, T. J. Yen, K. Yoda, D. W. Cleveland |
Abstract |
The first centromeric protein identified in any species was CENP-A, a divergent member of the histone H3 family that was recognised by autoantibodies from patients with scleroderma-spectrum disease. It has recently been suggested to rename this protein CenH3. Here, we argue that the original name should be maintained both because it is the basis of a long established nomenclature for centromere proteins and because it avoids confusion due to the presence of canonical histone H3 at centromeres. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
Brazil | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 128 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 27% |
Researcher | 28 | 21% |
Professor | 17 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 41% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 17 | 13% |