↓ Skip to main content

Esperanto for histones: CENP-A, not CenH3, is the centromeric histone H3 variant

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosome Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Esperanto for histones: CENP-A, not CenH3, is the centromeric histone H3 variant
Published in
Chromosome Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10577-013-9347-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. C. Earnshaw, R. C. Allshire, B. E. Black, K. Bloom, B. R. Brinkley, W. Brown, I. M. Cheeseman, K. H. A. Choo, G. P. Copenhaver, J. G. DeLuca, A. Desai, S. Diekmann, S. Erhardt, M. Fitzgerald-Hayes, D. Foltz, T. Fukagawa, R. Gassmann, D. W. Gerlich, D. M. Glover, G. J. Gorbsky, S. C. Harrison, P. Heun, T. Hirota, L. E. T. Jansen, G. Karpen, G. J. P. L. Kops, M. A. Lampson, S. M. Lens, A. Losada, K. Luger, H. Maiato, P. S. Maddox, R. L. Margolis, H. Masumoto, A. D. McAinsh, B. G. Mellone, P. Meraldi, A. Musacchio, K. Oegema, R. J. O’Neill, E. D. Salmon, K. C. Scott, A. F. Straight, P. T. Stukenberg, B. A. Sullivan, K. F. Sullivan, C. E. Sunkel, J. R. Swedlow, C. E. Walczak, P. E. Warburton, S. Westermann, H. F. Willard, L. Wordeman, M. Yanagida, T. J. Yen, K. Yoda, D. W. Cleveland

Abstract

The first centromeric protein identified in any species was CENP-A, a divergent member of the histone H3 family that was recognised by autoantibodies from patients with scleroderma-spectrum disease. It has recently been suggested to rename this protein CenH3. Here, we argue that the original name should be maintained both because it is the basis of a long established nomenclature for centromere proteins and because it avoids confusion due to the presence of canonical histone H3 at centromeres.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 128 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 27%
Researcher 28 21%
Professor 17 13%
Other 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Computer Science 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,070,236
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from Chromosome Research
#100
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,428
of 202,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosome Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.