↓ Skip to main content

The Siberian Traps and the End-Permian mass extinction: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Science Bulletin, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Siberian Traps and the End-Permian mass extinction: a critical review
Published in
Science Bulletin, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11434-008-0543-7
Authors

Andy Saunders, Marc Reichow

Abstract

The association between the Siberian Traps, the largest continental flood basalt province, and the largest-known mass extinction event at the end of the Permian period, has been strengthened by recently- published high-precision [superscript 40]Ar/[superscript 39]Ar dates from widespread localities across the Siberian province[1]. We argue that the impact of the volcanism was amplified by the prevailing late Permian environmental conditions—in particular, the hothouse climate, with sluggish oceanic circulation, that was leading to widespread oceanic anoxia. Volcanism released large masses of sulphate aerosols and carbon dioxide, the former triggering short-duration volcanic winters, the latter leading to long-term warming. Whilst the mass of CO[subscript 2] released from individual eruptions was small compared with the total mass of carbon in the atmosphere-ocean system, the long ‘mean lifetime’ of atmospheric CO[subscript 2], compared with the eruption flux and duration, meant that significant accumulation could occur over periods of 10[superscript 5] years. Compromise of the carbon sequestration systems (by curtailment of photosynthesis, destruction of biomass, and warming and acidification of the oceans) probably led to rapid atmospheric CO[subscript 2] build-up, warming, and shallow-water anoxia, leading ultimately to mass extinction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 143 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Student > Bachelor 32 21%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 10 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 91 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Environmental Science 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 25 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,064,746
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#87
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,807
of 183,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.