| Title |
Friendship Satisfaction in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Nominated Friends
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-016-2970-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neysa Petrina, Mark Carter, Jennifer Stephenson, Naomi Sweller |
| Abstract |
The current study examined the level of friendship satisfaction of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their nominated friends (with and without diagnosis of ASD). A total of 77 target children with ASD and friends from 49 nominated friendships participated in the study. Relatively high levels of friendship satisfaction were reported by both target children and their nominated friends with no overall difference between dyads involving typically developing friends and friends with ASD. Analysis at the individual dyad level showed a high level of agreement on the reported level of satisfaction across the target participants and their friends. Limitations and directions for future research are presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Nepal | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,778,491
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#721
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,146
of 417,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.