↓ Skip to main content

The Emergent Literacy Skills of Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
The Emergent Literacy Skills of Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2964-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. F. Westerveld, J. Paynter, D. Trembath, A. A. Webster, A. M. Hodge, J. Roberts

Abstract

A high percentage of school-age students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have reading comprehension difficulties leading to academic disadvantage. These difficulties may be related to differences in children's emergent literacy development in the preschool years. In this study, we examined the relationship between emergent literacy skills, broader cognitive and language ability, autism severity, and home literacy environment factors in 57 preschoolers with ASD. The children showed strengths in code-related emergent literacy skills such as alphabet knowledge, but significant difficulties with meaning-related emergent literacy skills. There was a significant relationship between meaning-related skills, autism severity, general oral language skills, and nonverbal cognition. Identification of these meaning-related precursors will guide the targets for early intervention to help ensure reading success for students with ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 26%
Social Sciences 27 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Linguistics 9 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 81 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,857,054
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,575
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,482
of 421,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#24
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.