↓ Skip to main content

Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports

Overview of attention for article published in Internal Medicine Journal, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports
Published in
Internal Medicine Journal, October 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00929.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. A. Scott, P. B. Greenberg

Abstract

Practising clinicians are assailed daily with reports of new therapeutic clinical trials. The evidence-based medicine movement has developed critical appraisal methods for assessing the validity and impact of such studies. However, challenges persist in regards to the appropriate interpretation and application of trial results within everyday clinical settings. Using selected examples from recently published literature, we illustrate 15 cautionary themes for translating research evidence from therapeutic trials into clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 6%
Kenya 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 27 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 9 29%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%