You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports
|
---|---|
Published in |
Internal Medicine Journal, October 2005
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00929.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
I. A. Scott, P. B. Greenberg |
Abstract |
Practising clinicians are assailed daily with reports of new therapeutic clinical trials. The evidence-based medicine movement has developed critical appraisal methods for assessing the validity and impact of such studies. However, challenges persist in regards to the appropriate interpretation and application of trial results within everyday clinical settings. Using selected examples from recently published literature, we illustrate 15 cautionary themes for translating research evidence from therapeutic trials into clinical practice. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 29% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 55% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |