↓ Skip to main content

Will a Category Cue Affect You? Category Cues, Positive Stereotypes and Reviewer Recall for Applicants

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychology of Education, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Will a Category Cue Affect You? Category Cues, Positive Stereotypes and Reviewer Recall for Applicants
Published in
Social Psychology of Education, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1009656413789
Authors

Todd L. Pittinsky, Margaret Shih, Nalini Ambady

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 36%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Design 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychology of Education
#172
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 41,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychology of Education
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.