| Title |
Dust Is in the Air: Effects of Occupational Exposure to Mineral Dust on Lung Function in a 9-year Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lung, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00408-013-9463-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karl Hochgatterer, Hanns Moshammer, Daniela Haluza |
| Abstract |
Occupational mineral dust exposure is a well-known risk factor for numerous respiratory and systemic diseases. The aim of the present longitudinal study was to assess the influence of work-associated dust exposure on spirometric results. Furthermore, the impact of implementation of stricter limit values for occupational contact with quartz dust on lung function was evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 33% |
| Thailand | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,118,061
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#233
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,618
of 199,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.