↓ Skip to main content

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17510 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4124 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2000
DOI 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna F. Stroup, Jesse A. Berlin, Sally C. Morton, Ingram Olkin, G. David Williamson, Drummond Rennie, David Moher, Betsy J. Becker, Theresa Ann Sipe, Stephen B. Thacker, for the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 33 <1%
United States 27 <1%
Brazil 17 <1%
Canada 13 <1%
Netherlands 10 <1%
Spain 10 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Colombia 6 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Other 41 <1%
Unknown 3954 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 646 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 586 14%
Student > Master 511 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 289 7%
Student > Bachelor 276 7%
Other 1036 25%
Unknown 780 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1668 40%
Psychology 244 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 226 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 4%
Social Sciences 139 3%
Other 611 15%
Unknown 1090 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#420,324
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,795
of 36,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192
of 40,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.