↓ Skip to main content

Discovering Sequence Motifs with Arbitrary Insertions and Deletions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
295 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
citeulike
17 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovering Sequence Motifs with Arbitrary Insertions and Deletions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin C. Frith, Neil F. W. Saunders, Bostjan Kobe, Timothy L. Bailey

Abstract

BIOLOGY IS ENCODED IN MOLECULAR SEQUENCES: deciphering this encoding remains a grand scientific challenge. Functional regions of DNA, RNA, and protein sequences often exhibit characteristic but subtle motifs; thus, computational discovery of motifs in sequences is a fundamental and much-studied problem. However, most current algorithms do not allow for insertions or deletions (indels) within motifs, and the few that do have other limitations. We present a method, GLAM2 (Gapped Local Alignment of Motifs), for discovering motifs allowing indels in a fully general manner, and a companion method GLAM2SCAN for searching sequence databases using such motifs. glam2 is a generalization of the gapless Gibbs sampling algorithm. It re-discovers variable-width protein motifs from the PROSITE database significantly more accurately than the alternative methods PRATT and SAM-T2K. Furthermore, it usefully refines protein motifs from the ELM database: in some cases, the refined motifs make orders of magnitude fewer overpredictions than the original ELM regular expressions. GLAM2 performs respectably on the BAliBASE multiple alignment benchmark, and may be superior to leading multiple alignment methods for "motif-like" alignments with N- and C-terminal extensions. Finally, we demonstrate the use of GLAM2 to discover protein kinase substrate motifs and a gapped DNA motif for the LIM-only transcriptional regulatory complex: using GLAM2SCAN, we identify promising targets for the latter. GLAM2 is especially promising for short protein motifs, and it should improve our ability to identify the protein cleavage sites, interaction sites, post-translational modification attachment sites, etc., that underlie much of biology. It may be equally useful for arbitrarily gapped motifs in DNA and RNA, although fewer examples of such motifs are known at present. GLAM2 is public domain software, available for download at http://bioinformatics.org.au/glam2.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
France 4 1%
Italy 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 296 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 31%
Researcher 57 18%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 15 5%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 40 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 22%
Computer Science 32 10%
Engineering 7 2%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 44 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,329,556
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,104
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,931
of 87,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.