↓ Skip to main content

The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
445 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
Title
The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4612-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire J. Tipping, Meg Harrold, Anne Holland, Lorena Romero, Travis Nisbet, Carol L. Hodgson

Abstract

Early active mobilisation and rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is being used to prevent the long-term functional consequences of critical illness. This review aimed to determine the effect of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in the ICU on mortality, function, mobility, muscle strength, quality of life, days alive and out of hospital to 180 days, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and discharge destination, linking outcomes with the World Health Organization International Classification of Function Framework. A PRISMA checklist-guided systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and controlled clinical trials. Fourteen studies of varying quality including a total of 1753 patients were reviewed. Active mobilisation and rehabilitation had no impact on short- or long-term mortality (p > 0.05). Meta-analysis showed that active mobilisation and rehabilitation led to greater muscle strength (body function) at ICU discharge as measured using the Medical Research Council Sum Score (mean difference 8.62 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-15.86), greater probability of walking without assistance (activity limitation) at hospital discharge (odds ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.19-3.83), and more days alive and out of hospital to day 180 (participation restriction) (mean difference 9.69, 95% CI 1.7-17.66). There were no consistent effects on function, quality of life, ICU or hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation or discharge destination. Active mobilisation and rehabilitation in the ICU has no impact on short- and long-term mortality, but may improve mobility status, muscle strength and days alive and out of hospital to 180 days. CRD42015029836.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 682 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 13%
Student > Master 86 13%
Researcher 54 8%
Other 51 7%
Student > Postgraduate 44 6%
Other 150 22%
Unknown 208 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 199 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 165 24%
Neuroscience 16 2%
Engineering 9 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 1%
Other 51 7%
Unknown 234 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#278,804
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#234
of 5,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,581
of 418,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.