↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions with Panax ginseng

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions with Panax ginseng
Published in
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13318-016-0387-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meenakshi R. Ramanathan, Scott R. Penzak

Abstract

Panax ginseng is widely used as an adaptogen throughout the world. The major active constituents of P. ginseng are ginsenosides. Most naturally occurring ginsenosides are deglycosylated by colonic bacteria to intestinal metabolites. Ginsenosides along with these metabolites are widely accepted as being responsible for the pharmacologic activity and drug interaction potential of ginseng. Numerous preclinical studies have assessed the influence of various ginseng components on cytochrome P450 (CYP), glucuronidation, and drug transport activity. Results from these investigations have been largely inconclusive due to the use of different ginseng products and variations in methodology between studies. Drug interaction studies in humans have been conflicting and have largely yielded negative results or results that suggest only a weak interaction. One study using a midazolam probe found weak CYP3A induction and another using a fexofenadine probe found weak P-gp inhibition. Despite several case reports indicating a drug interaction between warfarin and P. ginseng, pharmacokinetic studies involving these agents in combination have failed to find significant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions. To this end, drug interactions involving P. ginseng appear to be rare; however, close clinical monitoring is still suggested for patients taking warfarin or CYP3A or P-gp substrates with narrow therapeutic indices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 28 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 34 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,822,151
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
#83
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,444
of 415,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them